Legal Opinion

Davis v. Southwestern Bell Telephone

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 2006No. 101,267PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.

¶ 1 Judge Richard L. Blanchard denied claimant’s workers’ compensation claim on the grounds that he failed to rebut by a preponderance of the evidence the presumption that the injury was not work related because he did not report the injury to employer or receive medical treatment for his alleged work-related injury within thirty (30) days from the date of the injury.

¶ 2 Title 85 O.S.2001 § 24.2 provides that if an injury occurs on the job, the injured employee must either give notice to the employer or receive medical treatment within thirty (30) days of the date the injury occurred or face…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Clayton v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Pauls Valley Travel Center v. BoucherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Berg v. Parker Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Conaghan v. Riverfield Country Day SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Hogg v. Oklahoma County Juvenile BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Carbajal v. Precision Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. LEWIS v. DUST BOWL TULSA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. CARBAJAL v. PRECISION BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API