Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Special Indemnity Fund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1986No. 64655PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the worker’s reopening claim against the Special Indemnity Fund [Fund] was correctly determined to have been time barred because the critical antecedent motion for a supplemental award against her employer upon an asserted change of condition had not been timely brought. We answer in the affirmative and reinstate the trial tribunal’s order denying claimant a supplemental award against the Fund.

Claimant, who was a physically impaired person with a pre-existing 18.5% impairment of the body, sustained a compensable back injury on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Levi v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Beatty v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Schulte Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API