Legal Opinion

People v. One 1941 Buick Sport Coupe

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1946No. L. A. 19709PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The state obtained a judgment forfeiting an automobile in which an occupant of it, without the knowledge of the registered owner who then had possession and control of the vehicle, was carrying some marihuana cigarettes. The propriety of that judgment depends upon the construction of the forfeiture provisions of the Health and Safety Code.

In the “Notice of Seizure and Intended Forfeiture Proceedings” the attorney general asserted that the automobile “was used to unlawfully conceal, convey, carry or transport marihuana, and marihuana was in the possession of an occupant thereof.” By its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Peisch and Others v. WARE AND OTHERS &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1808
  3. People v. One 1941 Ford 8 Stake TruckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. One 1941 Cadillac Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. One 1933 Plymouth Sedan Deluxe Automobile, Engine No. P. D. 165124California Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. State v. 1971 Green GMC VanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. People v. One 1951 Ford SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API