Legal Opinion

People v. One 1941 Ford 8 Stake Truck

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1945No. L. A. 19220PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The Consolidated Produce Company has appealed from an adverse judgment rendered in a proceeding authorized by the Health and Safety Code for the purpose of forfeiting to the state a 1941 Ford truck upon the ground that it was used to unlawfully transport narcotics. The defense unsuccessfully urged in the trial court and now presented upon appeal is that a vehicle in the possession of an employee of the owner, but being used for the unlawful purpose in violation of specific restrictions as to the place of operation fixed by the owner, is not subject to forfeiture.

The appellant is engaged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. One 1933 Plymouth Sedan Deluxe Automobile, Engine No. P. D. 165124California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Trent v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re One 1965 Ford MustangArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re HuddlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API