Legal Opinion

People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible Coupe

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1955No. L. A. 23728PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— In this proceeding the People seek the forfeiture of an automobile for being used in violation of section 11610 of the Health and Safety Code. The notice of seizure and intended forfeiture (Health & Saf. Code, § 11612 et seq.) was directed to Mrs. V. E. Phillips, the registered owner, Ronald Leon Phillips, her son, and the Bank of America, the legal owner. Mrs. Phillips defaulted. The bank answered, denying that the vehicle was used in violation of the narcotics laws and that any narcotic was unlawfully in the possession of any occupant thereof.

The cause was tried by the court sitting…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API