Legal Opinion
People v. One 1941 Cadillac Club Coupe
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1944No. Civ. 14133PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff commenced proceedings to forfeit the defendant automobile on the ground that it was used unlawfully to transport narcotics (secs. 11610-11629, Health & Safety Code—formerly known as the State Narcotic Act). Pursuant to the code provisions, the following were notified of the proceeding: Gilbert B. Gonzales, the registered owner, and Pacific Finance Corporation of California, the legal owner. Gilbert B. Gonzales, the registered owner, filed an answer in which he denied that the vehicle was used unlawfully to conceal, convey, carry or transport narcotics. By its answer the legal owner,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. McKoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. One Harley-Davidson MotorcycleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. One 1940 Chrysler Convertible CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. One 1938 Buick SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. One 1939 Buick 8 CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. One 1940 Buick 8 SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Golden Gate Scenic Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. One 1941 Buick Sport CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.