Legal Opinion

Van Oster v. Kansas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 23, 1926No. 303PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiff in error purchased-an automobile of local deal- ' ers in Finney County, Kansas, agreeing, as part considera tion for the sale, to its retention by the vendors for use in their business. Clyde Brown, an associate of the dealers, was permitted by them, with the knowledge of plaintiff in error, to make frequent use of the automobile. Brown was arrested by state officers and an information was filed charging that he used an automobile (which was plaintiff’s) for the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor and seeking its forfeiture and- sale as a common nuisance under the Kansas…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Bromley v. McCaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API