People v. One 1951 Ford Sedan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This appeal presents the following question : Can the state forfeit the interest of an owner of an automobile where the owner rents the automobile to a bailee, who, in turn, entrusts it to a malefactor, who uses the car, illegally, and contrary to the terms of the rental agreement, to transport narcotics 1 The trial court answered this question in the affirmative and forfeited the interest of the registered and legal owner, who is the intervener. The intervener appeals.
The appeal comes to us on a settled statement. In addition, the trial court wrote a memorandum opinion that is included in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. One 1941 Ford 8 Stake TruckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Addison v. AddisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McBain v. Santa Clara Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dahlin v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.