Legal Opinion
People v. One 1933 Plymouth Sedan Deluxe Automobile, Engine No. P. D. 165124
California Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1939No. S. F. 16193PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The People have appealed from an adverse judgment in a proceeding to obtain a forfeiture of the title and interest of the owners and others in a 1933 Plymouth sedan automobile.
Caroline Sarubbi, as owner of the automobile, was duly served with the notice required by section 15 (b) of the State Narcotic Act as amended. (Stats. 1935, p. 2'212.) The notice stated that the vehicle “was seized by the Division of Narcotic Enforcement of the State of California on or about the 12th day of August, 1937, while said vehicle was being used to unlawfully conceal, convey, carry or transport narcotics…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. Lee FoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Ford 8 Stake TruckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. One 1948 Chevrolet Convertible CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. One 1941 Mercury Sedan, Engine No. 302286California Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. One 1937 Lincoln Zephyr SedanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.