Legal Opinion

Black v. Russell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1927No. 17479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

The parties appear here as they appeared in the trial tíourt. Plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendant from enforcing a judgment alleged to be void. The cause arose out of another action to which reference is necessary. In that case two of the defendants here, Smith and Seidler, recovered a money judgment of $8,005, with $800 as attorneys’ fee and $46.50 as costs, against Holiday Oil Company and Black Petroleum Company. The cause was appealed to this court, and the judgment superseded, with the plaintiff here and another as sureties. The judgment on appeal was affirmed except as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. United States v. LefflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Olson v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Mountain Home Lumber Co. v. SwartwoutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Holiday Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. M. E. Trapp Associated v. TankersleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Carlock v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Wagner v. EarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Barnthouse v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API