Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Earp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1937No. 26867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Lincoln county, Okla., sustaining a motion of plaintiffs below to strike a supplemental answer filed in said cause by plaintiffs in error in this appeal, after the main case had been heard in the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, judgment had been entered, and the mandate had been sent to the district court.

In order to have a full understanding of this case, it will be necessary to refer to the judgment of this court on appeal in the main case of Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation et al., reported in 167 Okla. 87, 27 P. (2d) 855. In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Moody v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Galbreath v. WallrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Willson v. Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Pickett v. Security Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API