Carlock v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This is a second appeal to-this court. The original case is reported in 104 Okla. 152, 230 P. 516 [Chapman v. Carloek], The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The above styled suits were consolidated by order of this court. In the first suit plaintiffs seek to recover rentals under an oil and gas lease, which they sought to cancel, and the second is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel tlie district court of Carter county to enter judgment-for said rentals under the'mandate of this court.
Plaintiffs’ original action was for the cancellation of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Galbreath v. WallrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Mountain Home Lumber Co. v. SwartwoutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Duffitt & Ramsey v. CrozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wagner v. EarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
- Pickett v. Security Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939