M. E. Trapp Associated v. Tankersley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This appeal involves .a judgment for interest rendered upon a mandate from this court after affirmance of a judgment granting an accounting and distribution of assets of a partnership.
For several years, the plaintiffs in error, who will be referred to as Trapp, and the defendants in error, who will be referred to as Tankersley, had, as limited partners, been engaged in a joint venture, constructing large governmental or army-navy projects under contract with the federal government, and had accumulated substantial profits in money and other assets when, on March 2, 1944, Tankersley filed this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Harden v. HardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Vilbig Const. Co. v. WhithamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- City of Barnsdall v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Black v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Benson v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Essley v. MershonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.