Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1985No. 59451PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Four issues are presented by this appeal from a postjudgment order: [1] Does the prejudgment interest authorized by 12 O.S. 1971 § 727(2) 1 apply only when recovery is upon a cause of action [claim] for personal injury or also when a severed element of recovery allowed and separately identified in the jury verdict may be termed to be one for an injury to the person, either bodily or psychic in character? [2] Assuming that prejudgment interest attaches to every qualified item of recovery rather than merely to the character of the claim pressed, did the recovery for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API