Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Four issues are presented by this appeal from a postjudgment order: [1] Does the prejudgment interest authorized by 12 O.S. 1971 § 727(2) 1 apply only when recovery is upon a cause of action [claim] for personal injury or also when a severed element of recovery allowed and separately identified in the jury verdict may be termed to be one for an injury to the person, either bodily or psychic in character? [2] Assuming that prejudgment interest attaches to every qualified item of recovery rather than merely to the character of the claim pressed, did the recovery for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.