Barnthouse v. City of Edmond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
73 P.3d 840 (2003)
2003 OK 42
Timothy Ray BARNTHOUSE, Ancel Scott Fees and James Dallas Teel, II, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
CITY OF EDMOND, a municipal corporation and Dennis Cochran, individually and in his capacity as the Chief of Police of the City of Edmond, Defendants/Appellees.
No. 97,350.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
April 22, 2003.
Philip W. Anderson, Kent R. McGuire, Oklahoma City, OK, for Appellants.
Richard J. Goralewicz, Oklahoma City, OK, and Stephen T. Murdock, City of Edmond, Edmond, OK, for Appellees.
OPINION
WATT, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The dispositive questions in this appeal are: (1)…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Winchester; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Winchester.
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.