Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting a new trial after verdict in its favor and against the plaintiffs on its cross-complaint. In February, March, and April, 1921, the parties hereto entered into nine separate contracts, wherein the plaintiffs agreed to buy and the defendant agreed to sell approximately 1000 tons of wiping rags for a price aggregating over $100,000. Both parties were doing business in San Francisco and the merchandise was, under the contracts, to be shipped from Antwerp, Belgium. A portion of the goods was received by the buyer and paid for. The balance was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Texas Company v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Geo. A. Moore & Co. v. MathieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Wilson v. Corrugated Kraft Containers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Porter v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.