Legal Opinion

People v. Findley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1901No. Crim. No. 668PublishedCited by 48 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

—The defendant was convicted of embezzling eight thousand dollars, public money in his hands as tax-collector of San Luis Obispo County, and sentenced to eight years in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment of conviction. We will consider the points urged for reversal in the order in which they appear in appellant’s brief.

1. When this case was called for trial, defendant’s attorney, pursuant to the provisions of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure, moved the court to secure the services of some judge, other than the regular judge of the court, to preside at the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. TraversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Walker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API