Legal Opinion

City of Gordon v. Ruse

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2004No. S-03-624PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In 2002, the City of Gordon abandoned proceedings it had instituted in the county court for Sheridan County to acquire by condemnation certain real property owned by Marshall D. Ruse and Hazel B. Ruse. The Ruses sought recovery of certain fees and costs pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 76-726(1) (Reissue 2003). The county court awarded the Ruses $1,500 in attorney fees but held that it lacked statutory authority to award other fees and expenses which they alleged to have incurred because of the condemnation action. This appeal by the Ruses presents the issue of what fees and expenses are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Microsoft Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Simon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Unisys Corp. v. Nebraska Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brown v. Harbor Financial Mortgage Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rauscher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nebraska Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Salts v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Neiman v. TRI R. ANGUS, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Jura v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API