Legal Opinion

Salts v. Lancaster County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2005No. S-04-642PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In this appeal, Robert Salts contends that Lancaster County exceeded its statutory authority in establishing certain durational residency requirements for primary health care benefits through its general assistance program. We agree and reverse the decision of the district court, and remand the cause for further proceedings.

FACTS

On March 17, 2003, Salts moved to Lancaster County in order to receive substance abuse treatment at Comhusker Place of Lincoln-Lancaster County, Inc. (Cornhusker Place). Immediately prior to this move, Salts lived in Beatrice for 1 month, Kearney for 3 months, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gilroy v. RybergNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mathews v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Reents v. WoltemathNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mogensen v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Nebraska Public Service Commission v. Roberts Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geddes v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. County of Lancaster v. County of CusterNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. County of LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Gilbert M. & Martha H. Hitchcock Foundation v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API