Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Microsoft Corp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 2004No. S-01-1325PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Jill A. Arthur and Nancy Waters, the plaintiffs, filed a class action against Microsoft Corporation in the district court for Dodge County. The plaintiffs brought the action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging a violation of Nebraska’s Consumer Protection Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998 & Cum. Supp. 2000), and Neb. *588U.C.C. § 2-302 (Reissue 2001). The district court sustained Microsoft’s demurrer and dismissed the action without leave to amend, finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action. On appeal, we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Webb v. American Employers GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Kanne v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.