Bovard v. American Horse Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Robert Bovard appeals from the judgment dismissing his supplemental complaint against defendants, American Horse Enterprises, Inc., and James T. Ralph. Bovard contends the trial court erroneously concluded the contract upon which his action was founded was illegal and void as contrary to public policy; alternatively, he contends it is the law of the case that the contract does not violate public policy. Ralph cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s postjudgment order striking his memo randum of costs and taxing costs. We shall affirm the judgment and post-judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.