Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer to the present action for implied dedication of a public recreational easement and declaratory and injunctive relief without leave to amend. We conclude that appellant’s action is barred by a settlement incorporated into judgments entered in prior suits, and affirm the judgment.
Statement of Facts and Procedural History
Throughout this century a tide of controversy and litigation over the competing rights of private ownership and public access has swept over the sands of the Bolinas Sandspit, and more specifically a northwesterly…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Howard v. America Online Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Clement v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.