Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We granted a hearing in this case in order to resolve a conflict in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal on whether a party who obtains a judgment against a fiduciary for fraud is entitled to recover attorney fees as an element of the damages incurred. Walters v. Marler (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 1, 30 [147 Cal.Rptr. 655], held that the victim of the fraud is entitled to such damages, while Pederson v. Kennedy (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 976, 980 [180 Cal.Rptr. 740], decided the contrary.
Plaintiff, the owner of a landscape contracting business, made an offer in writing in May 1978 to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.