Legal Opinion

Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1984No. S.F. 24569PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted a hearing in this case in order to resolve a conflict in the decisions of the Courts of Appeal on whether a party who obtains a judgment against a fiduciary for fraud is entitled to recover attorney fees as an element of the damages incurred. Walters v. Marler (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 1, 30 [147 Cal.Rptr. 655], held that the victim of the fraud is entitled to such damages, while Pederson v. Kennedy (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 976, 980 [180 Cal.Rptr. 740], decided the contrary.

Plaintiff, the owner of a landscape contracting business, made an offer in writing in May 1978 to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API