Legal Opinion

Ward v. Great Western Power Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1933No. Docket Nos. 4939, 4938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

These are appeals from orders denying motions for change of venue. The actions were brought in Butte County, and the corporate defendants moved to change the place of trial to the city and county of San Francisco, where they have their principal place of business. The cases were consolidated as they involve identical issues.

The complaints are quite lengthy but it is only necessary for the purpose of this appeal to refer to the facts involving venue. The actions are for recovery of damages for fraud. It is alleged that the Western Canal Company was a corporation wholly owned, operated and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hammond v. Ocean Shore Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Krogh v. Pacific Gateway & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Nakata v. Guarantee Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Hiett v. Inland Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodspeed v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Konig v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Clary v. Basalt Rock Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Goodspeed v. Great Westernn Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API