Legal Opinion
Goodspeed v. Great Westernn Power Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1937No. Civ. 5618; Civ. 5690; Civ. 5691; Civ. 5692; Civ. 5693; Civ. 5694; Civ. 5695; Civ. 5696; Civ. 5697; Civ. 5698; Civ. 5699; Civ. 5700; Civ. 5701; Civ. 5702; Civ. 5703; Civ. 5704; Civ. 5705; Civ. 5706; Civ. 5707; Civ. 5708; Civ. 5709; Civ. 5710PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Upon the ground that there was no judge in the county of Butte qualified to act in the above entitled actions, defendants moved for a change of place of trial. After hearing, the motion was denied and these appeals from those orders were then taken. The specific grounds of objection will be hereinafter mentioned.
Early in this century the predecessors of Great Western Power Company were engaged in the construction of Lake Almanor and in acquiring water rights in connection therewith. The Feather River .Canal Company was organized as a public utility in 1908. This company held certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Western Canal Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Chance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.