Legal Opinion
Heffernan v. Bennett & Armour
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1944No. Civ. 12535PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
As assignee of Challenge Cream and Butter Association, a creditor of Bennett & Layton, Inc., the plaintiff commenced an action to set aside an alleged fradulent conveyance. In his complaint he alleged that the defendant was a corporation; that its principal place of business was in the city and county of San Francisco; that Challenge Cream and Butter Association was a corporation; that on the 24th day of April, 1939 Bennett & Layton, Inc. was doing business as a dealer in dairy products and poultry and had incurred an indebtedness in the sum of $275,000 and on said date was insolvent; that on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- McNulty v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rice v. SchubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.