Hammond v. Ocean Shore Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mono County granting a motion for change of venue. J. D. Murphey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff brought the action to recover the sum of three hundred and thirty-five dollars which, it is alleged, he was induced, by false and fraudulent representations, to pay to defendant as a part of the purchase price -of certain lots of land in San Mateo County. Defendant appeared and in proper form moved for a change of venue to the city and county of San Francisco, supporting the motion by an affidavit of the president of the corporation in which it was set out: That said defendant has now and did have at the time of the commencement of this action, its principal place of business in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Bank of Yolo v. Sperry Flour Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Hefflebower v. DetrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fitzhugh v. University of Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.