Krogh v. Pacific Gateway & Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County refusing to change the place of trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this state and its principal place of business is the city of Stockton, San Joaquin county. The action was commenced in the- superior court of the county of Fresno. Defendant appeared and, at the time of filing its demurrer, filed an affidavit of merits and made demand and moved the court that the place of trial be changed from Fresno county to San Joaquin county. The motion was denied and defendant appeals from the order.
The action was commenced to recover damages for the false and fraudulent representations alleged to have been made by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Fresno National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Cohn v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Trezevant v. W. R. Strong Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Konig v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Rowe v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- McDuffie v. California Tehama Land Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.