Legal Opinion

Hiett v. Inland Finance Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1928No. Docket No. Sac. 4045PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the defendants from an order of the superior court of the county of Stanislaus denying their motion for change of place of trial to San Joaquin County, where at the time of the institution of the action the defendant corporation had its principal office and place of business, and where also the defendant Ross resided.

The plaintiffs commenced this action in the county of Stanislaus against The Inland Finance Corporation, joining with said corporation the defendant Ross, who was alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint to be the president and managing agent of said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Ward v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Taylor v. J. B. Hill Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API