Hoell v. Mellon
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
At the outset, it has seemed necessary to me to decide in my mind, in. the absence of any controlling authority presented to or discovered by me, just what, if in any way, are the limits allowed in this kind of proceeding. The defendant’s brief lays stress on the burden of proof, etc. I have used the word “proceeding” advisedly, for it seems to me that this word, appearing in section 5 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138½bb), refers to all steps in procedure to be taken, rather than to any definite name of any step.
Judge Anderson, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoag v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . GreenwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Baltimore & O. R. v. RamboCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Schnitzler v. YellowleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
- State v. BrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shapiro v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
- Smith v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Qualtop Beverages, Inc. v. MacCampBellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Stroh Products Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925
- Blair v. GraupnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.