Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Lyle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 11, 1929No. 656PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is not contended that the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) intrudes into the field of opinion, or restrains the profession of religions faith or propoganda of religious principles, or inhibits the use of sacramental wine in the practice of religious rites. It was never intended the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, '* * * ” could bo invoked as a defense to a.ets inimical to the peace and good order of society (Davis v. Beason, 133 U. S. 342, 10 S. Ct. 299, 33…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Corneli v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Manchester v. LeibyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Minersville School Dist. v. GobitisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. HillyardDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  4. Jones v. City of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Mitchell v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API