Legal Opinion
Schnitzler v. Yellowley
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, brought by the plaintiff to review the action of the defendants in revoking in part the permit theretofore granted to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was a retail druggist, to whom a retail basic permit had been issued by the prohibition department. In November, 1922, a citation was issued by the prohibition department requiring her to show cause why her permit should not be revoked for the reasons set forth in said citation, as follows :
“You are not in good faitb conforming to the provisions of the National Prohibition Act and regulations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Matter of Farley v. . WurzNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People ex rel. Belden Club v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Suss v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- People ex rel. Connolly v. MurrayThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wischhusen v. Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Wischhusen v. American Medicinal Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Shapiro v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
- Hoell v. MellonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Smith v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.