Qualtop Beverages, Inc. v. MacCampBell
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ADLER, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, brought under sections 5 and 9, tit. 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA §§ 14, 21), for the review of the decision of the acting prohibition administrator revoking complainant’s permit.
The defendant raises the question that this action does not entitle the complainant to introduce a new defense, after neglecting to do so at the hearing. The revocation proceeding was held on Eebruary 15, and March 5, 1927, and at the close of tho government’s ease the permittee elected to introduce no evidence. A criminal proceeding was pehding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Schnitzler v. YellowleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
- Hoell v. MellonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. One 1935 Model Pontiac Sedan Automobile, Motor No. 6-11834District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
- Benson v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
- Briggs v. AdelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Magar v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Ortega v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.