Stroh Products Co. v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a manufacturer of ice cream, ice, soft drinks, near beer, malt syrup, and liquid malt. In its manufacture of near beer it uses the so-called dealcoholizing process, and during the years 1922, 1923, and 1924 operated under a permit issued under the provisions of the. National Prohibition Law (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.). It also manufactures and sells a liquid barley malt. '
Plaintiff applied for a renewal of its permit for the year 1925, but was informed, four or five days before the expiration of its 1924 permit, that its application…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Nosowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. GebeleinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Shapiro v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- California Wine Ass'n v. DoranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1928
- Herrman v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.