Legal Opinion

Stroh Products Co. v. Davis

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 11, 1925No. 911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, District Judge.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of ice cream, ice, soft drinks, near beer, malt syrup, and liquid malt. In its manufacture of near beer it uses the so-called dealcoholizing process, and during the years 1922, 1923, and 1924 operated under a permit issued under the provisions of the. National Prohibition Law (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1013814 et seq.). It also manufactures and sells a liquid barley malt. '

Plaintiff applied for a renewal of its permit for the year 1925, but was informed, four or five days before the expiration of its 1924 permit, that its application…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. United States v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Nosowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. GebeleinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  2. Shapiro v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
  3. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. California Wine Ass'n v. DoranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1928
  5. Herrman v. LyleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API