Legal Opinion
Smith v. Foster
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THACHER, District Judge.
The application for a permit under sections 4 and 6 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. . 309 [Comp. St. §§ 10138y2b, 10138%c]), was filed with the collector of internal revenue in Hartford, Conn., in July, 1925. The bond required by the regulations was filed at or about the same time, and the application appears to comply with the regulations of the department. Before making application for the permit, the applicants leased for a term of one year from August 1, 1925, premises suitable for the storage of denatured alcohol in Waterbury, Conn. Not having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Schnitzler v. YellowleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923
- Hoell v. MellonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Vollmer Beverage Co. v. BlairDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- In Re CarterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Purepac Corp. v. HelveringDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Qualtop Beverages, Inc. v. McCampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.