Legal Opinion
Gunn-Williams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 17, 1985No. 665-83CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
YOCK, Judge.
On November 4, 1983, the plaintiff filed a direct access suit in this Court, seeking to convert the Government’s termination for default into a termination for convenience and to recover appropriate termination costs. In support thereof, the plaintiff alleged that the Government’s cure notice was improper and that, in any event, she was meeting her obligations under the contract. As a result, the plaintiff sought damages in the amount of $131,796.05, representing payment allegedly due pursuant to the contract provisions regarding termination for convenience.
On January 13,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Williams International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Milmark Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Shank-Artukovich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- SGW, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.