Milmark Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
This Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (cda)1 case comes to us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed a direct access suit (41 U.S.C. § 609) in this court, seeking damages for defendant’s allegedly illegal termination of a service contract. Defendant requests that we dismiss the petition on two grounds: (1) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (occ or Comptroller) is a nonappropriated fund instrumentality which is immune from suit in this court; and (2) the contract was properly terminated for the convenience of the government, and plaintiff has been fully…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- L'Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bath Iron Works Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Lawrence H. Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Donald M. Drake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.