Legal Opinion
Shank-Artukovich v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 29, 1987No. 305-84CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This opinion is issued following trial, extensive post-trial briefing, and oral argument. The dispute arises over several incidents that occurred during the performance of a fixed-price construction contract. This contract was let by the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) for the construction of a mile long, hard rock tunnel. The tunnel is known as the Santa Clara Tunnel and it was constructed to carry water from an inland reservoir to coastal California. For the reasons set forth below judgment is awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Bruce Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Kaiser Industries Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Iacobelli Construction, Inc. v. County of Monroe, Rochester Pure Waters District, and Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- M.J. Paquet, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Big Chief Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Weaver-Bailey Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.