Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Huston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1980No. 21902, CA 10795, SC 26124PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

This is a personal injury negligence case in which the jury returned a verdict for the exact amount of special damages claimed. Following reinstruction by the trial court, the jury returned a verdict for a larger amount. Judgment was entered thereon. The defendants claim that the trial court erred in failing to receive the first verdict. We agree and reverse.

THE FACTS

The plaintiff, a milkman, fell while making a delivery to the defendants, and sued for damages. The defendants denied responsibility for the fall, denied that the plaintiff sustained injury, and claimed that the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Rogers v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mullins v. ROWE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kennedy v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Davis v. HinmanOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hovey v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API