Legal Opinion

Rickard v. Ellis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1962PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff in an automobile collision. The jury found that defendant was negligent but that plaintiff suffered no injuries in the collision. Plaintiff moved the court to resubmit the cause to the jury on the ground that the evidence was uncontradicted that plaintiff was injured as a result of the collision. The motion was denied. Plaintiff contends on appeal that the court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion.

The collision occurred under the following circumstances. Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Luis v. MuhrbackOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Inwall v. Transpacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Connell v. McLoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1895

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Coleman v. MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API