Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Wheeler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2014No. CC CV080512; CA A149019; SC S061836PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

Oregon law requires that “[i]n civil cases three-fourths of the jury may render a verdict.” Article VII (Amended), section 5(7), of the Oregon Constitution; ORCP 59 G(2). In this negligence case, defendant admitted liability, and a jury of twelve was asked to decide the issues of causation and damages. The jury completed a special verdict form and unanimously agreed that defendant had caused damage to plaintiff. At least three-fourths of the jurors (i.e., nine of twelve) also agreed to award plaintiff specific amounts of economic and noneconomic damages. However, the same nine jurors did not…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SuppahOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Chang v. ChunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Gozzi v. Western Culinary Institute, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API