Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Howard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1954PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the circuit court which sustained a motion made by the plaintiff for a new trial. The action in which the challenged order was made was based upon two charges of assault and battery. The complaint (amended) averred- that the defendant, on June 23, 1950, and again on July 29, 1950, assaulted and beat the plaintiff. For the purported assault of June 23 the plaintiff sought $100 special, $1,000 general, and $2,500 punitive damages. For that of July 29 he demanded $500 special, $7,500 general, and $5,000 punitive damages. The answer (amended),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cowenhoven v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Lewis Ex Rel. Lewis v. StormsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API