Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hinman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1980No. A7612 17974, CA 10787, SC 26148PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, J,

This is another personal injury case in which it is claimed that the jury improperly returned an unsegregated verdict for only the special damages. The verdict was received. Thereafter, on plaintiffs motion for new trial, the trial judge ordered a new trial. Defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed. We granted review in this case and in Wheeler v. Huston, 288 Or 467, 605 P2d 1339 (1980), to reconsider the rule applicable to verdicts for only the amount of the claimed specials.

THE FACTS

Plaintiffs fall resulted in a broken wrist. There was evidence that her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Mullins v. ROWE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sedillo v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wheeler v. HustonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Davis v. HinmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennion v. LeGrand Johnson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Combs v. HahnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Jones v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Bass v. Hermiston Medical Center, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API