Mullins v. ROWE ET UX
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Defendants Rowe appeal from an order of the trial court setting aside a verdict and granting Plaintiff Mullins a new trial.
The only question is whether there was a legal reason for the trial court to grant a new trial. If there was, then his discretion in the matter will not be disturbed on appeal. If not, the order must be reversed and judgment entered on the verdict.
Plaintiff had sued for $35,000 general and $2,582 special damages on a cause of action arising out of an automobile accident. There was a defense of contributory negligence. There were jury questions both with reference to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Stein v. HandyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Snyder v. Amermann, Jr.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Saum v. BonarOregon Supreme Court · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.