Legal Opinion
Application of Bo Thuresson Af Ekenstam
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 24, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6372PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, one member dissenting, affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 to 4, inclusive, and 6 to 9, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent on a method of oxidizing cyclic compounds. The rejection is based on a single reference, namely the patent to Du Pont (Belgium) 494,439, having a “brevet octroyé” date of March 31, 1950, and a “brevet publié” date of July 1, 1950.
Since it is not disputed that the reference discloses the invention defined by the appealed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Trico Products Corporation v. Delman Corporation Delman Corporation v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Scovill Mfg. Co. v. SatlerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval Holman, Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In re HOWARTHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.