Legal Opinion

Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1878PublishedCited by 429 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This suit was brought by the American Nicholson Pavement Company against the city of Elizabeth, N. J., George W. Tubbs, and the New Jersey Wood-Paving Company, a corporation of New Jersey, upon a patent issued to Samuel Nicholson, dated Aug. 20, 1867, for a new and improved wooden pavement, being a second reissue of a patent issued to said Nicholson Aug. 8, 1854. The reissued patent was extended in 1868 for a further term of seven years. A copy of it is appended to the bill; and, in the specification, it is declared that the nature and object of the invention consists in providing a process…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Shaw v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Livingston v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

3Cited by429 opinions

  1. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

424 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API