Legal Opinion
General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1944PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This action puts in issue (1) the validity and scope of a number of patents for electrical discharge devices and ultra violet lamps and (2) the infringement of the patents by the manufacture and sale of fluorescent and germicidal lamps.
Patents in Suit
Plaintiff, General Electric Company, charges that claim 3 of patent No. 1,790,153 issued to Hull, January 27, 1931, for an electrical discharge device, and claims 6, 13, 25 and 27 of patent No. 2,182,732 issued to Meyer, Spanner and Germer, December 5, 1939 for metal vapor lamps, have been infringed by the defendant,…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Marce BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Bourns, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Standard Oil Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.