Legal Opinion

Reid v. Overland Machined Products

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1961No. L. A. No. 26046PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTratnor, J.

— -Plaintiff was employed by Overland Machined Products Company on February 25, 1952, as its exclusive sales representative. In this action he seeks an accounting for wages and commissions allegedly earned pursuant to a written contract of employment.

The contract provides: “For his services rendered herein *206and for faithful performance thereof, second party shall receive a commission of five per cent, (5%) of the entire gross business done by first party subsequent to 25th day of February, 1952.

“It is distinctly understood and agreed that second party shall only be entitled to receive any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Singh v. Southland Stone, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API