Legal Opinion

Voris v. Lampert

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2019No. S241812PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Kruger, J.

*1144 For a little more than a year, Brett Voris worked alongside Greg Lampert to launch three start-up ventures, partly in return for a promise of later payment of wages. But after a falling out, Voris was fired and the promised compensation never materialized. Voris sued the companies and won, successfully invoking both contract-based and statutory remedies for the nonpayment of wages. He now seeks to hold Lampert personally responsible for the unpaid wages on a theory of common law conversion. Voris claims that by failing to pay the wages, the companies converted his personal *1145 property to their…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. (PC)White v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. A&C Trade Consultants, Inc. v. AlvarezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Beluca Ventures LLC v. Einride AktiebolagDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API