Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiff, an insurance company, obtained a favorable declaration of its rights under a written agency contract in its action against defendant agent.
The contract was made in February, 1950, and according to its terms and as found by the court, plaintiff appointed defendant its general agent to solicit and obtain purchasers of insurance policies of a certain type in a specified area, the policies to be issued in plaintiff’s name as insurer. Generally the insurance to be sold was for property damage and public liability in connection with a certain class of motor vehicles. The contract was to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. SchmiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.